As I'm in a hotel on vacation, awaiting the five inches of snow we'll be getting tonight, I saw the best article on the sham that is global warming / climate change / whatever buzzword the environmentalists are using. Here are a few snippets that stand out:
"...temperatures have been dropping in a way wholly unpredicted by all those computer models"
"...global temperatures have dropped sharply enough to cancel out much of their net rise in the 20th century."
"All those hysterical predictions...have infuriatingly failed to materialise.
"...hundreds of proper scientists, including many of the world's most eminent climate experts, have been rallying to pour scorn on that "consensus" which was only a politically engineered artefact, based on ever more blatantly manipulated data and computer models programmed to produce no more than convenient fictions."
"...panicking politicians are waking up to the fact that the world can no longer afford all those quixotic schemes for "combating climate change" with which they were so happy to indulge themselves in more comfortable times."
Every day we see that "going green" isn't for the environment, but for green in the wallets of those purporting the global warming hoax. Use some logic people. It doesn't take Einstein to figure out that the predictions made were wrong when temperatures have stayed the same for 10 years and then dramatically decreased, erasing nearly 100 years of "warming."
The best argument I've heard is that it isn't warming, but "extreme" weather conditions and cooling is a byproduct of warming. Huh? Just admit the argument is lost, don't change the way it was defined and avoid the question. The ocean levels are not rising and the polar caps are not melting, at least not in the doom and gloom scenario that is thrown out there. Lets exaggerate and say the temperature has magically risen by ten degrees. Think basic science for a moment - the ice is frozen. Unless that ice was at the borderline of melting - which the polar caps are not - then they'll still be frozen. Even taking into consideration the ice close to the melting point which would turn to water, it wouldn't be close to enough to cause any changes. The Earth is ~ 70% water, with the amount of ice required to melt to cause any discernible changes to be vastly more than any of us could imagine. The numbers don't add up - not in the volume of ice, not in the measured temperature and not in the amount of variables which aren't taken into consideration, such as variances in temperature gathering, natural occurrences, historical trends over thousands of years, not the thirty or so we've been recording them with any semblance of accuracy, etc...
Global warming is about greed and control. The average citizen sees through the scam, but the elitists are blind to that and keep feeding lies, knowing that if you say something enough, people will assume it to be true.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
